In the landscape of UK equity income investments, two prominent choices for investors are the iShares UK Dividend UCITS ETF (IUKD) and The City of London Investment Trust (CTY). While both aim to provide income and capital growth from UK-listed companies, they represent fundamentally different approaches: passive index tracking versus active management. This distinction is crucial in understanding their total return profiles over various periods.
Recent Performance at a Glance
Based on the latest available data, here’s a snapshot of their recent total return performance:
Period
iShares UK Dividend UCITS ETF (IUKD) – NAV Total Return
The City of London Investment Trust (CTY) – NAV Total Return
The City of London Investment Trust (CTY) – Share Price Total Return
Year-to-date (YTD)
~20.4%
–
–
1 Year
~19.2%
~15.1%
~19.2%
3 Years
~60.3%
~44.0%
~44.6%
5 Years
~109.1%
~92.4%
~97.9%
10 Years
~68.4%
~109.8%
~106.8%
Note: Data is as of mid-October 2025 and sourced from fund providers. Past performance is not indicative of future results.1
Dissecting the Numbers and Strategies
IUKD, as a passive exchange-traded fund (ETF), mirrors the performance of the FTSE UK Dividend+ Index.2 This index comprises the 50 highest-yielding stocks within the FTSE 350, excluding investment trusts.3 Its strategy is straightforward and transparent: to capture the returns of the UK’s top dividend-paying companies.4 This approach has proven effective in the shorter term, particularly in periods favouring high-yield stocks.
CTY, on the other hand, is an actively managed investment trust with a history stretching back to 1861.5 It is managed by Job Curtis, who has been at the helm for over three decades.6 The trust focuses on a portfolio of predominantly large-cap UK companies with a strong track record of dividend growth.7 This active management allows for flexibility to navigate different market conditions and select companies that the manager believes have long-term potential beyond just a high current yield. The long-term performance of CTY, particularly over a 10-year horizon, showcases the potential benefits of this active approach.
Key Differences Influencing Total Returns
Several factors contribute to the differing total return profiles of IUKD and CTY:
Management Style: IUKD’s passive nature means its performance is directly tied to its underlying index.8 CTY’s active management allows for stock selection based on in-depth research and a long-term outlook, which can lead to outperformance or underperformance relative to a benchmark.9
Portfolio Composition: While both focus on UK dividend stocks, their top holdings show nuanced differences. IUKD’s portfolio is dictated by the index’s methodology, leading to a focus on the highest yielders at a specific point in time.10 CTY’s manager has the discretion to invest in companies with a consistent history of dividend growth, even if their current yield isn’t among the absolute highest.
Costs: As a passive ETF, IUKD generally has a lower ongoing charge (around 0.40%) compared to the actively managed CTY (with an ongoing charge of approximately 0.37% but active management comes with other costs).11 Over the long term, these cost differences can impact total returns.
Discount/Premium to NAV: As an investment trust, CTY’s share price can trade at a discount or premium to its Net Asset Value (NAV).12 This can impact the shareholder’s total return, as seen in the one-year figures where the share price total return was higher than the NAV total return, indicating a narrowing of the discount or a move to a premium. ETFs like IUKD typically trade very close to their NAV.
Conclusion: Which is the Better Choice?
The choice between IUKD and CTY for total returns depends on an investor’s philosophy and time horizon.
For investors seeking a low-cost, transparent way to gain exposure to high-yielding UK stocks, and who are comfortable with the inherent volatility of such a strategy, IUKD has demonstrated strong performance, particularly in the shorter term.
For those who favour a long-term, actively managed approach with a focus on companies with a proven ability to consistently grow their dividends, CTY presents a compelling case, as evidenced by its strong 10-year track record.13 The long and successful tenure of its fund manager provides an element of stability and experience.14
Ultimately, a thorough analysis of both options in the context of an individual’s investment goals and risk tolerance is essential before making any investment decisions.
For sophisticated investors, the Seed Enterprise Investment Scheme (SEIS) offers an unparalleled combination of generous tax reliefs and the potential for explosive growth. But in a landscape of private, early-stage companies, how do you separate the high-flyers from the hopefuls?
Unlike VCTs or public equities, you can’t simply look up a 3-year performance table for SEIS funds. The true value of these investments is typically realised over five to ten years, upon a successful sale or IPO. So, how can an investor gauge success in the shorter term? By looking for the clues: industry recognition and, most importantly, a track record of real-world exits.
The Challenge of Measuring Early-Stage Success
Before we dive in, it’s crucial to understand why SEIS performance is so opaque. These funds invest in fledgling businesses whose valuations are not updated daily. A company’s worth is often only formally reassessed during new funding rounds or upon an exit. This means a simple three-year performance metric doesn’t capture the full picture and can even be misleading.
Instead, savvy investors must act like detectives, piecing together evidence to identify managers who consistently make smart bets.
A Mark of Quality: Following the Awards 🏆
Industry awards are a strong indicator of a fund manager’s quality, expertise, and reputation among their peers. Events like the EISA (EIS Association) Awards and the Growth Investor Awards rigorously assess managers, and consistent winners are often at the top of their game.
Based on recent accolades, a few names repeatedly appear in the winner’s circle:
Jenson Funding Partners: A veteran in the SEIS space, Jenson is highly respected for its long track record and deep experience. Their recent win as “Best SEIS Investment Manager” at the 2024 EISA Awards highlights their continued excellence.
SFC Capital: As one of the UK’s most active seed-stage investors, SFC Capital has built a vast and diverse portfolio. Their frequent award wins are a testament to their ability to source and secure high-quality deals at scale.
Fuel Ventures: With a sharp focus on tech and software startups, Fuel Ventures has carved out a niche as a top-tier manager for investors seeking exposure to this high-growth sector. Their recognition as a “Best SEIS Investment Manager” underscores their success in this competitive space.
The Ultimate Proof: Successful Exits 🚀
While awards are a great signpost, the ultimate validation of any venture capital strategy is a successful exit. This is where potential on paper turns into tangible returns in an investor’s pocket.
Some managers are more transparent than others about their wins, and these figures provide invaluable insight:
Jenson Funding Partners has successfully exited 12 companies from its SEIS funds, delivering an impressive average exit multiple of 4.69x for their investors.
SFC Capital recently celebrated a partial exit from payment platform Ryft, which generated a 6.2x return for the SEIS investors who backed the company.
These examples are powerful proof points, demonstrating a manager’s ability to not only pick winners but also guide them toward a profitable exit.
Your Due Diligence Checklist ✅
When evaluating an SEIS opportunity, past performance is just one piece of the puzzle. Use this checklist to ensure you’re looking at the complete picture:
Manager’s Track Record: Do they have a long and proven history of investing, nurturing, and exiting early-stage companies?
Investment Strategy: What is their sector focus? Does their approach to building a diversified portfolio align with your risk appetite?
Quality of Deal Flow: How do they source their investment opportunities? A manager’s network and reputation are critical for accessing the most promising startups.
Portfolio Support: Do they take an active role in helping their companies succeed? Look for managers who provide mentorship and strategic support, not just capital.
Ultimately, identifying the best SEIS funds requires looking beyond simple league tables. By focusing on industry accolades, a proven history of successful exits, and a robust due diligence process, you can position yourself to tap into the remarkable growth potential of the UK’s most innovative startups.
So, you’re ready to expand your investment horizons beyond the FTSE 100. You’ve been eyeing up those US tech giants or perhaps some promising European stocks. That’s fantastic! Investing globally is one of the best ways to diversify your portfolio and tap into worldwide growth. But before you dive in, there’s a sneaky cost that many new investors overlook: foreign exchange (FX) fees.
Every time you buy shares in a currency different from your own (like buying Apple stock in US dollars with your British pounds), your broker has to convert your money. For this service, they charge a fee, and trust me, these fees can vary wildly between platforms. A seemingly small percentage can nibble away at your profits over time, turning a great investment into a mediocre one.
So, how do you keep more of your hard-earned money? By choosing a trading app with low FX rates. We’ve done the digging to find out which UK share trading apps are the best for cost-conscious global investors.
The Low-Fee Champions: Where to Get the Best Rates
For those who want the absolute lowest FX charges, two platforms consistently come out on top:
Interactive Brokers: This platform is a favourite among serious and frequent traders for a reason. It boasts an incredibly low FX fee of just 0.03%. This is about as close to the raw market rate as you can get as a retail investor, making it a powerful choice for those making larger or more frequent international trades.
Trading 212: A hugely popular app, Trading 212 offers a very competitive and simple flat FX fee of 0.15%. Its user-friendly interface combined with this low rate makes it an excellent all-rounder for both new and experienced investors looking to trade overseas.
The Challenger Apps: Hot on Their Heels
The fintech revolution has brought a wave of new, agile platforms challenging the old guard. These apps often focus on transparency and low costs:
Lightyear: A newer entrant to the scene, Lightyear is making waves with its transparent fee structure. It charges a flat 0.35% on currency conversions, placing it firmly in the low-cost camp and making it a strong contender.
Freetrade: Known for its commission-free trading model, Freetrade operates a tiered FX fee system. Your rate depends on your subscription plan: the free Basic plan has a 0.99% fee, which drops to 0.59% on the Standard plan, and an attractive 0.39% on the Plus plan.
A Note on Traditional Brokers
What about the more established, traditional brokerage platforms? While they offer a wealth of research and a huge range of investments, their FX fees are often higher and more complex. Platforms like Interactive Investor and AJ Bell use a tiered fee system, where the percentage fee gets lower as the size of your trade increases. This can be cost-effective for very large lump-sum investments, but for smaller, regular purchases, the fees can be significantly higher than the newer apps.
The Secret Weapon: Multi-Currency Accounts
Here’s a pro tip: some platforms, including Trading 212 and Lightyear, allow you to hold cash in different currencies within your investment account. This is a game-changer for active international investors. You can convert a larger sum of pounds to dollars in one go (paying just one FX fee) and then use that dollar balance to buy and sell US stocks as often as you like, without incurring conversion fees on every single trade.
The Bottom Line
Choosing the right platform can make a real difference to your long-term returns. While commission-free trading is a great headline feature, it’s crucial to look under the hood at other costs, especially if you’re investing internationally. For UK investors, the evidence is clear: for the lowest FX fees, Interactive Brokers and Trading 212 are leading the pack.
UK Trading App FX Fee Comparison
App
Foreign Exchange (FX) Fee
Key Feature
Interactive Brokers
0.03%
Industry-leading low rate for active traders.
Trading 212
0.15%
Simple, low flat fee and multi-currency account option.
Lightyear
0.35%
Transparent flat fee and multi-currency account option.
Freetrade
0.99% (Basic) 0.59% (Standard) 0.39% (Plus)
Tiered fees based on subscription plan.
AJ Bell
Tiered (Higher for smaller trades)
Fee percentage decreases as trade value increases.
Interactive Investor
Tiered (Higher for smaller trades)
Fee percentage decreases as trade value increases.
Hargreaves Lansdown
Generally higher tiered rates
Established platform with extensive research tools.
Heads Up, Investors: The UK Capital Gains Tax-Free Allowance Has Been Slashed Again
The government has once again tightened the rules on investment profits. For the 2025/26 tax year, the UK Capital Gains Tax (CGT) allowance has been cut in half.
Here’s what you need to know to stay ahead.
The New Capital Gains Allowance: It’s Just £3,000
The Capital Gains Tax allowance – officially known as the Annual Exempt Amount – is the amount of profit you can make from selling assets in a tax year before you have to pay any tax.
For the 2025/26 tax year (6 April 2025 to 5 April 2026), this allowance will be:
£3,000 for individuals
£1,500 for most trusts
This is a sharp drop from the £6,000 allowance in 2023/24 and a world away from the £12,300 it was just a few years ago. This trend means that even small investment gains that were previously tax-free might now result in a tax bill. 📉
What Happens if Your Profits Exceed the Allowance?
If your total capital gains in the tax year are more than £3,000, you’ll pay tax on the excess amount. The rate you pay depends on two things: your Income Tax band and the type of asset you’ve sold.
The CGT rates for 2025/26 are:
On most assets (like shares or funds held outside an ISA):
10% if you’re a basic rate taxpayer
20% if you’re a higher or additional rate taxpayer
On residential property (that isn’t your main home):
18% if you’re a basic rate taxpayer
28% if you’re a higher or additional rate taxpayer
Important: Your capital gains are added on top of your regular income. This means a large gain could push you into a higher tax bracket, and you’ll pay the higher rate of CGT on the portion of the gain that falls into that new bracket.
How to Protect Your Gains 🛡️
With the allowance now so low, smart planning is more crucial than ever. Here are a few key strategies to consider:
Maximise Your ISA: This is your best defence! Any gains you make on investments held within a Stocks & Shares ISA are completely free from Capital Gains Tax. You can invest up to £20,000 each tax year.
Use Your Pension: Like an ISA, any growth within your pension pot is sheltered from CGT.
Think as a Couple: If you’re married or in a civil partnership, you can transfer assets to your partner without triggering a CGT event. This allows you to use both of your individual £3,000 allowances, potentially shielding up to £6,000 of gains per year.
Harvest Your Gains Annually: Consider selling investments to realise gains up to the £3,000 annual limit. By “harvesting” your tax-free allowance each year, you can prevent a much larger, taxable gain from building up over time.
The key takeaway is that the goalposts have moved. The days of ignoring small investment profits are over. By understanding these changes and using the tax-efficient accounts available, you can keep more of your hard-earned money. 💰
Here are the tax rates and how they apply to capital gains and dividends for Australian resident individuals.
It is important to note that the Australian financial year runs from 1 July to 30 June. The rates below are the most current available.
Individual Income Tax Rates (2024-2025)
The tax on both capital gains and dividends is determined by your marginal income tax rate. From 1 July 2024, the following rates apply to Australian resident individuals:
Taxable Income
Tax on this Income
$0 – $18,200
Nil
$18,201 – $45,000
19% of the excess over $18,200
$45,001 – $135,000
$5,092 + 30% of the excess over $45,000
$135,001 – $190,000
$32,097 + 37% of the excess over $135,000
$190,001 and over
$52,447 + 45% of the excess over $190,000
Important Note: In addition to the rates above, most resident taxpayers are also required to pay the Medicare Levy, which is 2% of their taxable income. Low-income earners may be eligible for a reduction or exemption.1
Capital Gains Tax (CGT) Rates
As explained previously, Australia does not have a separate tax for capital gains. The “rate” is your marginal income tax rate plus the Medicare levy. The key is how much of the gain is subject to tax.
Assets held for less than 12 months: 100% of the net capital gain is added to your taxable income and taxed at your marginal rate.
Assets held for 12 months or more: You are entitled to a 50% CGT discount.2 This means only 50% of the net capital gain is added to your taxable income and taxed at your marginal rate.
Example with Actual Rates:
Let’s say you are in the 30% tax bracket with an income of $80,000. You make a $10,000 capital gain on shares.
The tax rate on dividends is also your marginal income tax rate. However, the effective tax you pay is significantly altered by franking credits, which are tied to the corporate tax rate.3
Standard Corporate Tax Rate: 30%
Base Rate Entity Corporate Tax Rate: 25% (for companies with an aggregated turnover of less than $50 million)
The franking credit attached to your dividend is based on the tax rate the company paid.4
Unfranked Dividends:
These are simple. The entire dividend amount is added to your taxable income and taxed at your marginal tax rate plus the Medicare Levy.
Example: You receive a $1,000 unfranked dividend. Your marginal rate is 30% (+2% Medicare Levy).
Tax payable: $1,000 x 32% = $320
Franked Dividends:
This is a two-step process to calculate your tax.
“Gross up” the dividend: Add the franking credit to the cash dividend you received to determine the pre-tax amount to include in your assessable income.
Calculate tax and apply the credit: Calculate the tax on the grossed-up amount, and then subtract the franking credit as a tax offset.
Example: Fully Franked Dividend from a 30% Tax Company
You receive a $700 cash dividend, fully franked.
Gross-up:
The company paid 30% tax, so the $700 represents the 70% of profit paid to you.
If your marginal tax rate is 47% (45% + 2% Medicare Levy):
Tax on $1,000: $1,000 x 47% = $470
Less franking credit: $470 – $300 = $170 tax to pay
If your marginal tax rate is 32% (30% + 2% Medicare Levy):
Tax on $1,000: $1,000 x 32% = $320
Less franking credit: $320 – $300 = $20 tax to pay
If your marginal tax rate is 21% (19% + 2% Medicare Levy):
Tax on $1,000: $1,000 x 21% = $210
Less franking credit: $210 – $300 = -$90
Result: $90 cash refund from the ATO
Disclaimer: These examples are for illustrative purposes. Individual financial circumstances can vary, and you should consider seeking advice from a registered tax agent or financial advisor.
An Executive Introduction to Venture Capital Trusts
Venture Capital Trusts (VCTs) represent a distinct and specialised segment of the UK investment landscape. They are structured as publicly listed companies on the London Stock Exchange, operating as closed-end investment funds.1 The primary mandate of a VCT is to raise capital from individual investors and deploy it into a portfolio of small, typically unquoted or AIM-listed companies based in the United Kingdom.3 This investment vehicle was introduced by the UK government through the Finance Act 1995 as a strategic initiative to encourage private investment into early-stage, high-growth-potential businesses that are crucial for economic innovation and job creation but may have limited access to traditional funding sources.5
The role of a VCT manager extends beyond the mere provision of capital. A core component of the VCT model involves the manager providing active strategic guidance, operational expertise, and access to extensive networks to help the underlying portfolio companies navigate the challenges of scaling up. This hands-on approach is designed to optimise the growth trajectory of these businesses, thereby enhancing the potential returns for the VCT’s shareholders.2
The structure of a VCT as a publicly traded entity that invests in predominantly private, illiquid assets creates a fundamental liquidity mismatch. While an investor can theoretically trade their VCT shares on the London Stock Exchange on any given day, the underlying assets—stakes in small, unlisted companies—cannot be easily sold or valued in real-time.3 This disparity gives rise to a critical characteristic of the VCT market. The primary tax incentive, a 30% upfront income tax relief, is available only to investors subscribing for newly issued shares.6 Consequently, the secondary market for existing VCT shares has limited natural buyers, leading to a supply and demand imbalance that typically forces the share price to trade at a persistent discount to the underlying Net Asset Value (NAV). This structural reality has necessitated the establishment of manager-facilitated share buyback programmes. These programmes provide an essential, albeit managed, exit route for long-term investors and are a key tool used by VCT boards to control the size of the NAV discount, effectively creating a more orderly secondary market.12
Classifications of VCTs
The VCT universe is broadly categorised based on investment strategy, allowing investors to select a trust that aligns with their risk appetite and sector outlook. The main classifications are as follows:
Generalist VCTs: This is the most prevalent type of VCT. Generalist trusts aim to mitigate risk by constructing a broadly diversified portfolio of investments across a wide range of industries, such as technology, healthcare, consumer goods, and business services.3 By avoiding over-concentration in any single sector, these VCTs can better withstand industry-specific downturns, a crucial risk management feature in the high-stakes arena of venture capital.
AIM VCTs: These trusts specialise in investing in companies whose shares are traded on the Alternative Investment Market (AIM), the London Stock Exchange’s market for smaller, growing companies.3 Companies listed on AIM are subject to specific regulatory requirements, which provides a degree of corporate governance and transparency. Furthermore, their shares are traded daily, offering greater liquidity compared to unquoted private companies, which can influence how the VCT manager constructs and exits positions.7
Specialist VCTs: These VCTs adopt a highly focused investment approach, concentrating their portfolio within a single industry or sector, such as media, healthcare, financial technology, or renewable energy.3 This lack of diversification means they carry a higher level of sector-specific risk. However, this concentrated strategy also offers the potential for superior returns if the chosen sector experiences a period of exceptional growth.
The High-Stakes Equation: Balancing Tax Alpha with Inherent Risk
The investment proposition of a VCT is fundamentally a balance between a unique set of tax advantages, which can be viewed as a form of government-sponsored “alpha,” and the significant, multifaceted risks associated with venture capital investing. The former is explicitly designed to compensate sophisticated investors for undertaking the latter.
The Unparalleled Tax Advantages (The “Alpha”)
The UK government offers a powerful suite of tax incentives to encourage investment into VCTs, which collectively enhance the potential net return for qualifying investors.
30% Upfront Income Tax Relief: An investor subscribing for new shares in a VCT can claim income tax relief equivalent to 30% of the amount invested, up to a maximum annual investment of £200,000. This provides a maximum tax reduction of £60,000 in a single tax year. A crucial condition for retaining this relief is that the VCT shares must be held for a minimum of five years.2 This upfront relief immediately reduces an investor’s net capital at risk to 70 pence for every £1 invested.
Tax-Free Dividends: Any dividends paid out by a VCT to its shareholders are entirely free of income tax.2 This feature is particularly valuable for higher and additional-rate taxpayers. For an additional-rate taxpayer subject to a 39.35% tax on dividends, a 5% tax-free dividend yield from a VCT is equivalent to receiving a taxable dividend yield of approximately 8.24% from a conventional investment.15
Tax-Free Capital Gains: When an investor disposes of their VCT shares, any capital gain realised is completely exempt from Capital Gains Tax (CGT).2 This provides a significant advantage for long-term investors who see substantial growth in the value of their VCT holdings.
The 30% upfront tax relief creates a substantial performance buffer for the investor. This buffer is the primary mechanism through which the government compensates for the high-risk nature of the underlying investments. For example, consider an investment of £10,000 in a new VCT share offer. The investor can claim £3,000 back against their income tax liability, reducing their net investment cost to £7,000, while the VCT has £10,000 of capital to invest on their behalf.2 If, after the five-year minimum holding period, the VCT’s portfolio has experienced some failures and its NAV per share has declined by 20%, the investor’s holding would be valued at £8,000. Despite this 20% fall in the underlying asset value, the investor’s position remains £1,000 ahead of their net cost (£8,000 value versus £7,000 net cost), before accounting for any tax-free dividends received during the period. This illustrates that the total return for a VCT investor is a function of not only the fund’s performance but also this significant tax alpha.
A Comprehensive Risk Assessment
The generous tax reliefs are a direct reflection of the elevated risks inherent in the VCT structure and its investment mandate. Experienced investors must conduct a thorough assessment of these risks before committing capital.
Capital at Risk and Portfolio Volatility: The most fundamental risk is that VCTs invest in small, early-stage companies, which have a statistically higher rate of failure than larger, more established corporations. The value of an investment can fall as well as rise, and an investor may not get back the full amount invested.2
Long-Term and Illiquid Nature: The requirement to hold shares for at least five years to retain the upfront income tax relief makes VCTs an inherently long-term investment. Furthermore, the secondary market for VCT shares is limited, meaning it can be difficult to sell shares quickly. When a sale is possible, it is often at a notable discount to the NAV.10
Legislative and Tax Risk: The VCT scheme’s existence and its associated tax benefits are dependent on government policy. Future legislative changes could alter or withdraw these reliefs, which would likely have a material impact on the attractiveness and market value of VCTs.6
VCT Qualifying Status Risk: To offer tax reliefs, a VCT must continuously adhere to a complex set of rules set out by HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) regarding its investment activities. If a VCT fails to maintain its qualifying status, the tax advantages will be withdrawn. If this happens within five years of an investment, the investor may be required to repay the upfront income tax relief they claimed.10 This risk underscores the importance of selecting experienced and diligent VCT managers with strong compliance track records.
The Analyst’s Toolkit: Deciphering VCT Performance Metrics
To accurately assess and compare VCTs, it is essential to look beyond simple share price movements and understand the specific metrics that reflect the true performance of the underlying portfolio and the manager’s skill.
The Primary Metric: NAV Total Return
The most reliable indicator of a VCT manager’s performance is the Net Asset Value (NAV) Total Return.
Net Asset Value (NAV): This is the foundational valuation metric for any investment trust. It represents the total value of all the VCT’s assets (its portfolio of company investments, cash, and other assets) minus the value of all its liabilities.18 To get a per-share figure, the total NAV is divided by the number of shares in issue.
NAV Total Return: This metric provides a comprehensive view of the underlying performance of the VCT’s portfolio. It is calculated by taking the change in NAV per share over a specific period and adding back any dividends paid to shareholders during that same period.15 This calculation shows the true growth generated by the manager’s investment decisions, independent of the share price’s fluctuations on the secondary market. For instance, if a VCT’s NAV per share increases from $50p$ to $60p$ over a year, and it also paid a dividend of $5p$ per share, its NAV total return for that year would be $30\%$ (calculated as $(60p – 50p + 5p) / 50p$).19
The Income Component: Dividend Yield
For many investors, a primary attraction of VCTs is their ability to generate a regular, tax-free income stream.
Dividends: VCTs primarily distribute profits realised from their investment portfolio to shareholders in the form of dividends.9 These distributions are a critical component of the overall total return.20
Dividend Yield: This is typically expressed as the total dividends paid per share over a year as a percentage of either the share price or the NAV per share. Many established VCTs have a stated policy of targeting a specific annual dividend yield, often in the region of 5% of the opening NAV for the year.14
The Market Reality: Share Price and the NAV Discount
While NAV Total Return measures the manager’s performance, the share price reflects the market’s valuation of the VCT, which incorporates factors beyond the underlying portfolio.
Market Price: This is the price at which an investor can buy or sell VCT shares on the London Stock Exchange’s secondary market.18
NAV Discount: The market price of a VCT almost invariably trades at a discount to its NAV per share.10 This discount is a function of several factors, including the illiquidity of the underlying assets, the fact that secondary market purchases do not qualify for the 30% upfront tax relief, and broader market sentiment. The VCT’s board and manager often use a share buyback policy to manage the size of this discount and provide a degree of liquidity for existing shareholders.12
When evaluating VCTs, it is crucial to differentiate between the manager’s ability to generate returns and the market mechanics that influence the share price. For example, consider two VCTs: VCT A has delivered a 5-year NAV Total Return of 60% and currently trades at a 10% discount to NAV, while VCT B has delivered a 40% NAV Total Return and trades at a tighter 3% discount. A superficial analysis might favour VCT B due to its narrower discount, interpreting it as a sign of higher quality or stronger market demand. However, the superior NAV Total Return of VCT A clearly indicates that its manager has been more effective at selecting successful investments and growing the underlying asset base. The wider discount could be attributable to factors such as a less aggressive buyback policy or a larger number of long-term shareholders seeking to exit. Therefore, while the NAV discount is an important consideration for entry and exit points, the NAV Total Return should be the primary metric for assessing long-term performance and manager skill.
Five-Year Performance Benchmark: A Quantitative Ranking of UK VCTs
To identify the leading VCTs based on the user’s criteria of total return over a five-year period, this analysis focuses on the NAV Total Return of the largest Generalist VCTs. This category represents the core of the VCT market and, as the data will show, has significantly outperformed other VCT strategies in the recent past.
Analysis of Generalist VCT Performance (Data to 30 June 2025)
The Generalist VCT sector has demonstrated strong performance over the medium term. According to market data compiled by Morningstar and Wealth Club, the average 5-year NAV Total Return for Generalist VCTs to 30 June 2025 was a commendable 33.1%.26 This figure underscores the sector’s capacity to generate substantial growth, rewarding investors for the high risks undertaken.
The performance across individual VCTs, however, varies significantly, highlighting the critical importance of manager selection. The following table ranks a selection of the largest Generalist VCTs by their 5-year NAV Total Return, providing an objective, data-driven foundation for identifying the top performers.
VCT Name
Manager
5-Year NAV Total Return (%)
3-Year NAV Total Return (%)
Foresight VCT
Foresight
94.2%
30.9%
British Smaller Companies VCT
YFM
74.3%
12.3%
British Smaller Companies VCT 2
YFM
68.6%
12.2%
Gresham House Income & Growth 2 VCT
Gresham House
63.8%
0.1%
Octopus Apollo VCT
Octopus
62.0%
17.6%
Foresight Enterprise VCT
Foresight
59.9%
14.7%
Gresham House Income & Growth VCT
Gresham House
56.3%
3.0%
Albion Enterprise VCT
Albion
50.8%
16.2%
Northern 2 VCT
Mercia
47.7%
9.8%
Northern Venture Trust
Mercia
46.5%
10.1%
Northern 3 VCT
Mercia
43.4%
8.8%
Puma VCT 13
Puma
41.3%
-6.1%
Albion Technology & General VCT
Albion
34.3%
5.7%
Albion Crown VCT
Albion
32.0%
5.6%
ProVen VCT
Beringea
23.7%
2.3%
Maven VCT 5
Maven
23.7%
2.8%
ProVen Growth & Income VCT
Beringea
19.9%
-5.6%
Maven VCT 3
Maven
19.6%
0.1%
Pembroke VCT B Shares
Pembroke
17.0%
-6.9%
Maven VCT 4
Maven
16.7%
-1.5%
Maven VCT
Maven
16.4%
3.2%
Baronsmead Second Venture Trust
Gresham House
9.8%
-3.0%
Baronsmead Venture Trust
Gresham House
9.0%
-1.5%
Puma Alpha VCT
Puma
3.3%
-24.3%
Average Generalist VCT
33.1%
1.3%
Source: Morningstar, Wealth Club. Data to 30 June 2025.26
A closer examination of the performance data reveals a critical trend. The 3-year NAV Total Return figures are markedly lower than the 5-year returns across the board, with the sector average dropping to just 1.3%. This indicates that the period from mid-2022 to mid-2025 was exceptionally challenging for the sector. The bulk of the impressive 5-year returns was generated in the first two years of that period (mid-2020 to mid-2022), which was characterised by a buoyant environment for technology and growth-focused assets. The subsequent period saw significant macroeconomic headwinds, including rising inflation and sharp interest rate hikes, which led to a broad market correction in growth stock valuations. Since VCTs are required to value their unquoted holdings with reference to the multiples of comparable listed companies, their NAVs were negatively impacted during this correction. This context is vital for setting future expectations; the extraordinary returns of 2021 are unlikely to be repeated consistently. It also highlights that a manager’s ability to preserve capital and protect NAV during a downturn is as important a skill as generating high returns in a bull market.
Comparative Analysis: The Underperformance of AIM VCTs
In sharp contrast to the positive returns from the Generalist sector, AIM-focused VCTs have faced a much more difficult five-year period. The average 5-year NAV Total Return for AIM VCTs to 30 June 2025 was a negative 11.0%.26 This significant divergence in performance reflects the different risk profiles and the acute sensitivity of the public AIM market to shifts in investor sentiment and economic conditions compared to the private, unquoted market where Generalist VCTs primarily operate. Given this pronounced underperformance, this report will concentrate its in-depth qualitative analysis on the leading performers within the Generalist VCT category.
Deep-Dive Analysis: Profiles of Leading Generalist VCTs
This section provides a detailed qualitative analysis of the top-performing Generalist VCTs identified in the previous section. The review covers their investment strategy, portfolio composition, performance drivers, fee structures, and the latest manager outlook to provide a holistic view beyond the headline performance numbers. The VCTs selected for this deep-dive are: Foresight VCT and Foresight Enterprise VCT; British Smaller Companies VCT and VCT 2; Gresham House Income & Growth VCT and VCT 2; and Octopus Apollo VCT.
Foresight VCT & Foresight Enterprise VCT
Investment Mandate: Managed by Foresight Group, these are generalist VCTs that invest in fast-growing, unquoted UK companies.27 Foresight VCT holds a portfolio of over 40 companies, while Foresight Enterprise VCT has a slightly more concentrated portfolio of over 35 innovative businesses with strong leadership teams.29
Portfolio & Sector Focus: The portfolios are well-diversified across a range of sectors, including Technology, Media and Telecommunications, Healthcare, Business Services, and Consumer & Leisure.27 Notable portfolio companies that exemplify their strategy include Callen-Lenz, a provider of software and components for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs); Professionals At Play, a leisure company capitalising on in-bar entertainment; and ClubSpark, a software platform for sports clubs.30
Performance & Dividends: Foresight VCT stands out as the top performer in the entire sector, delivering a remarkable 5-year NAV Total Return of 94.2%.26 Foresight Enterprise VCT has also produced a very strong return of 59.9% over the same period.26 Both VCTs aim to pay an annual dividend of at least 5% of the opening NAV for the financial year.31
Fees & Discount: The fee structure includes an annual management charge of 2.0% of NAV and a performance fee mechanism.32 The ongoing charges ratio for Foresight VCT is 2.2% 32, and for Foresight Enterprise VCT it is 2.3%.33 The board actively manages the NAV discount through a share buyback policy that targets a 5% discount to NAV.31 As of late 2025, the discount for Foresight Enterprise was approximately -5.6%.34
Manager Outlook: In recent reports, the manager has acknowledged the challenging domestic economic landscape marked by slow growth and persistent inflation. However, they report that the portfolio is performing well, with successful exits and a robust pipeline of new investment opportunities. The manager’s strong regional presence across the UK is cited as a key advantage in sourcing a diverse range of deals.35
Fundraising: Foresight Enterprise VCT launched a new offer for subscription to raise £20 million (with a £10 million over-allotment facility) in late 2023, indicating an active strategy of deploying fresh capital into new opportunities.37 Investors should monitor the company’s website for future fundraising announcements from both VCTs.38
British Smaller Companies VCT & VCT 2
Investment Mandate: Managed by the highly experienced YFM Equity Partners, British Smaller Companies VCT (launched in 1996) and VCT 2 (launched in 2000) are two of the longest-standing VCTs in the market. Their objective is to maximise total return for investors by investing in a diversified portfolio of UK businesses that leverage innovation in their products and services.39
Portfolio & Sector Focus: The VCTs have a strong strategic bias towards business services, with the combined portfolio heavily weighted towards companies in the data, application software, and tech-enabled services sectors, which together account for 76% of investments.42 A key driver of their recent performance has been the success of their largest holding, Matillion, a cloud data integration platform that achieved “unicorn” status with a valuation of $1.5 billion in 2021.42 The portfolios are somewhat concentrated, with the top 10 holdings accounting for over 34% of net assets in BSC1 and over 38% in BSC2.23
Performance & Dividends: Both VCTs have delivered exceptional performance, with 5-year NAV Total Returns of 74.3% for BSC1 and 68.6% for BSC2.26 Their stated objective is to provide investors with an attractive long-term tax-free dividend yield rather than targeting a specific percentage of NAV.39
Fees & Discount: The ongoing charge for BSC1 is competitive at 1.75%.44 As of late 2025, the shares traded at a discount to NAV of approximately -7.2%.23
Manager Outlook: The manager, YFM Equity Partners, emphasises its long-standing track record of nearly three decades in the VCT market, highlighting its experience in navigating various economic cycles and technological shifts to deliver value over time.40
Fundraising: In a strong signal of confidence and continued investment activity, the boards announced a new combined offer for subscription for the 2025/26 tax year, aiming to raise up to £60 million with a potential £25 million over-allotment facility.45 This provides a clear and current opportunity for new investment.
Gresham House Income & Growth VCT & VCT 2
Investment Mandate: Formerly known as the Mobeus VCTs, these trusts are now managed by Gresham House, which also manages the Baronsmead VCTs. They invest in diversified portfolios of unquoted UK companies with significant growth potential, with a particular focus on the consumer, healthcare & education, and business-to-business (B2B) sectors.47 A key differentiator for these VCTs is their explicit and ambitious target of paying an annual dividend equivalent to 7% of the opening NAV per share.49
Portfolio & Sector Focus: Following changes to VCT rules in 2015, the investment strategy has evolved to focus more on younger, earlier-stage growth companies.50 The portfolio is notably concentrated in its top holdings. The top five assets represent approximately 57% of the total portfolio value, with digital archiving software provider Preservica being a particularly significant holding, accounting for around 20-30% of the net assets of the respective trusts.49
Performance & Dividends: The VCTs have a strong long-term track record, ranking among the top performers over both five and ten years.24 Their 5-year NAV Total Returns are 56.3% for GHV1 and 63.8% for GHV2.26 Their higher dividend target makes them particularly attractive for income-seeking investors.
Fees & Discount: The ongoing charge is approximately 2.3%.24 A performance fee is in place, linked to returns exceeding an RPI-based hurdle.53 In late 2025, the NAV discount was relatively tight, ranging from approximately -4.2% to -6.5%.24
Manager Outlook: Recent manager commentary presents a balanced view. While strong performance from the larger, more established portfolio assets has continued to drive value, some of the younger companies have faced challenges in the uncertain macroeconomic environment. The manager has noted that the portfolio remains resilient but that increased volatility in returns is likely, given the strategic shift towards earlier-stage investments.51
Fundraising: The VCTs raise new capital through periodic offers for subscription, and investors should monitor the manager’s website for announcements of new fundraising rounds.57
Octopus Apollo VCT
Investment Mandate: Managed by Octopus Investments, the UK’s largest VCT manager, Octopus Apollo VCT has a distinct investment strategy. It focuses on investing in more established small and medium-sized B2B software companies that have already successfully commercialised their product or service and are seeking growth capital to scale their operations.14
Portfolio & Sector Focus: The VCT has a clear and consistent focus on the B2B software sector. It holds a diversified portfolio of around 45 companies.59 Top holdings include companies such as Natterbox (cloud telephony), Codebay Solutions (trading as Lodgify, a vacation rental software), and Sova Assessment (a hiring assessment platform).25
Performance & Dividends: Octopus Apollo has delivered a strong 5-year NAV Total Return of 62.0%.26 The VCT targets a regular, tax-free annual dividend of 5% of NAV.14
Fees & Discount: The ongoing charge is approximately 2.4%.62 A performance fee of 20% is in place.14 The discount to NAV in late 2025 was wider than some of its peers, at approximately -8.8%.25
Manager Outlook: Recent company announcements have been primarily operational, focusing on board appointments, rather than providing detailed strategic commentary on the market outlook.64
Fundraising: The VCT has a strong track record of successful fundraising, having previously increased an offer size due to high investor demand.65 As of late 2025, Octopus Apollo VCT is open for subscription, with a target to raise £50 million and an over-allotment facility for a further £25 million, providing a current opportunity for investment.22
Synthesis and Strategic Recommendations for 2025 and Beyond
This final section synthesizes the preceding quantitative and qualitative analysis into a comparative framework to provide clear, actionable recommendations tailored to an investor’s specific objectives, whether that is maximising total return, generating a high level of tax-free income, or achieving a balanced blend of both.
Comparative Framework: The Final Shortlist
The deep-dive analysis confirms that the top-performing VCTs each have distinct characteristics. The choice between them involves a trade-off based on an investor’s priorities.
For Maximising Total Return: The 5-year NAV Total Return data clearly identifies Foresight VCT and the British Smaller Companies VCTs as the standout performers. Their strategies, which have included backing and successfully exiting high-growth companies, have proven exceptionally effective in generating capital growth over the past market cycle.
For Maximising Dividend Income: The Gresham House Income & Growth VCTs are the pre-eminent choice for investors prioritising income. Their explicit and higher dividend target of 7% of opening NAV sets them apart from peers. Their investment policy, which may include structuring deals with loan stock alongside equity, is designed to support this regular and substantial income stream.49
The table below provides a summary for at-a-glance comparison of these leading VCTs.
VCT
Manager
5-Year NAV TR (%)
Dividend Target
Investment Focus
Ongoing Charge (%)
Current Fundraising Status (as of late 2025)
Foresight VCT
Foresight
94.2%
~5% of NAV
Generalist Growth
2.20%
Check website for new offers 38
British Smaller Co. VCTs
YFM
74.3% / 68.6%
Attractive long-term yield
Tech-enabled B2B Services
~1.75%
Open (£60m offer for 25/26) 45
Gresham House I&G VCTs
Gresham House
56.3% / 63.8%
7% of NAV
Generalist Growth (Consumer, B2B)
~2.30%
Check website for new offers 58
Octopus Apollo VCT
Octopus
62.0%
5% of NAV
B2B Software (Scale-up)
~2.40%
Open (£50m offer) 22
Forward-Looking Outlook and Final Recommendations
The consensus from VCT manager commentaries points towards a market environment that is both challenging and opportunistic. Economic uncertainty and higher interest rates have led to a compression of private company valuations, which may create more attractive entry points for new investments. However, existing portfolio companies continue to face macroeconomic headwinds, and the risk of failures remains elevated.35 In this climate, the ability of experienced managers to provide hands-on support to their portfolio companies and demonstrate disciplined stock-picking will be more critical than ever.
Based on this analysis, the following strategic recommendations are made:
Recommendation for Maximising Total Return: For an investor whose primary objective is long-term capital appreciation, the historical evidence strongly supports an allocation to Foresight VCT and the British Smaller Companies VCTs. Their market-leading 5-year NAV Total Returns demonstrate a superior ability to identify and nurture high-growth businesses. The current open offer for subscription from the British Smaller Companies VCTs presents an immediate and compelling opportunity to access this top-performing management team.
Recommendation for Maximising Dividend Income: For an investor focused on generating the highest possible tax-free income stream, perhaps to supplement pension or other retirement income, the Gresham House Income & Growth VCTs are the standout choice. Their stated 7% dividend target is the most aggressive among the top-tier VCTs and is supported by their investment strategy. While their total return is not the absolute highest, it remains very strong, offering an attractive combination of high income and capital growth potential.
Balanced Recommendation:Octopus Apollo VCT represents a robust, balanced option suitable as a core holding within a VCT portfolio. Its strategic focus on more mature, revenue-generating B2B software companies may offer a slightly de-risked approach compared to VCTs investing at the very earliest stages. Its performance track record is excellent, the dividend target is solid, and it benefits from the scale and resources of Octopus, the largest manager in the sector. Its current open offer provides a timely opportunity for investment.
In conclusion, the choice between these high-calibre VCTs ultimately depends on the individual investor’s primary financial objective. All have demonstrated exceptional management and delivered strong long-term performance. The decision rests on the preferred balance between maximising overall growth and generating a consistent, high level of tax-free income. A thorough review of the latest prospectus and Key Information Document for any open offer is an essential final step before making any investment decision.
How does Baronsmead stack up against the competition?
The Baronsmead VCTs, managed by Gresham House, represent a long-standing and distinct proposition within the VCT market.1 When compared against the top-performing VCTs on the metrics of total return and dividend yield, a clear picture emerges of a trust with a different risk-return profile, driven by a unique investment strategy.3
Performance on Total Return
The primary metric for assessing a VCT manager’s performance is the 5-year Net Asset Value (NAV) Total Return. On this measure, the Baronsmead VCTs have delivered significantly lower returns compared to the sector leaders over the last five-year period.
Baronsmead Venture Trust delivered a 5-year NAV Total Return of 9.0%.4
Baronsmead Second Venture Trust delivered a 5-year NAV Total Return of 9.8%.4
This performance is considerably below the average for Generalist VCTs, which was 33.1% for the same period, and trails the top performers by a substantial margin.4 For context, the top-ranked VCTs from the initial analysis delivered returns such as 94.2% (Foresight VCT) and 74.3% (British Smaller Companies VCT).4 This indicates that over the past market cycle, the Baronsmead strategy did not capture the same level of capital growth as its top-tier peers.3
Differentiating Investment Strategy
The divergence in performance can be largely attributed to Baronsmead’s distinct “hybrid” investment strategy.3 Unlike many VCTs that focus almost exclusively on direct investments into unquoted companies, the Baronsmead portfolio is constructed with three core components:
Direct Unquoted Investments: Like other VCTs, it invests directly in early-stage, high-growth UK businesses across sectors like technology, healthcare, and business services.1
AIM-Quoted Companies: The portfolio includes a significant allocation to companies listed on the Alternative Investment Market (AIM).5
Listed Equity Funds: A substantial portion of the portfolio is invested in other open-ended funds also managed by Gresham House, such as the WS Gresham House UK Micro Cap Fund and the UK Smaller Companies Fund.3
This fund-of-funds approach provides a high degree of diversification, spreading risk across a much larger number of underlying companies than a typical VCT.3 However, this structure also means that the VCT’s performance is a blend of direct venture capital returns and the performance of these other public equity funds. While this may offer stability, it can also dilute the high-growth potential from direct, successful venture capital exits that have driven the outsized returns of the top-performing VCTs.
Performance on Dividend Yield
Where Baronsmead VCTs compare more favorably is in their objective for income generation. The board has a stated dividend policy that uses a target of 7% of the opening NAV of the financial year as a guide when setting dividends.9
This is an ambitious target, placing it in the same category as the Gresham House Income & Growth VCTs, which were highlighted in the initial report for their income focus. The current dividend yield for Baronsmead Venture Trust is approximately 7.75%, confirming its status as a high-yielding VCT.9
Conclusion: A Comparison Summary
VCT
5-Year NAV TR (%)
Dividend Target
Investment Focus
Foresight VCT
94.2%
~5% of NAV
Generalist Growth (Direct)
British Smaller Co. VCT
74.3%
Attractive long-term yield
Tech-enabled B2B (Direct)
Gresham House I&G VCT
56.3%
7% of NAV
Generalist Growth (Direct)
Baronsmead Venture Trust
9.0%
~7% of NAV
Hybrid (Direct, AIM, Funds)
Generalist VCT Average
33.1%
Source for performance data: Morningstar, Wealth Club. Data to 30 June 2025.4
In summary, the Baronsmead Venture Trust does not compare favorably with the best-performing VCTs on a total return basis over the last five years. Its hybrid investment strategy, while highly diversified, has resulted in performance that lags both the sector leaders and the generalist VCT average.4
However, for an investor whose primary objective is to generate a high level of regular, tax-free income, the Baronsmead Venture Trust is a strong contender. Its 7% dividend target and high current yield make it a competitive alternative to other income-focused VCTs.9 The choice ultimately depends on an investor’s priority: for maximum capital growth, the top performers from the initial analysis remain superior; for a high and consistent dividend stream, Baronsmead Venture Trust warrants consideration.
Robinhood UK: No Direct FX Fees, But a 0.03% Third-Party Cost Applies
Robinhood UK promotes “no foreign exchange (FX) fees” for its customers trading US-listed stocks.1 While technically true that Robinhood doesn’t levy its own separate commission for currency conversion, there is an “implicit third-party cost” of 0.03% applied to all GBP to USD conversions.2
This charge is factored into the exchange rate you receive when you deposit or withdraw funds from your account. For example, on a £1,000 transfer to your USD balance, this would amount to a cost of £0.30.
This structure is a key part of Robinhood’s offering in the UK, which aims to provide a low-cost platform for accessing the US stock market. The company emphasizes that this 0.03% cost is from a third party and not a direct fee from Robinhood itself.3
It’s important for users to be aware of this cost, as it will affect the final amount of USD they have available for trading and the GBP amount they receive upon withdrawal. While small, this percentage can become more significant with larger transaction volumes.
In addition to this currency conversion cost, other standard regulatory and trading activity fees may apply to transactions on the platform.4 Users are encouraged to review Robinhood’s official UK fee schedule for a comprehensive understanding of all potential charges.
In the world of Venture Capital Trusts (VCTs), both British Smaller Companies VCT (BSC) and Octopus Apollo VCT stand out as prominent players, each offering investors a route into the potentially high-growth market of UK smaller companies, coupled with attractive tax benefits. While they share a common goal of fostering growth in fledgling businesses, they differ in their investment strategies, portfolio composition, and fee structures.
Investment Strategy and Focus
British Smaller Companies VCT adopts a generalist approach, investing across a broad range of sectors.1 The trust aims to build a diversified portfolio of businesses in both established and emerging industries that demonstrate strong potential for innovation and growth.2 This strategy allows for flexibility and the ability to capitalize on opportunities wherever they may arise in the UK’s small business landscape.
In contrast, Octopus Apollo VCT has a more specialized focus on business-to-business (B2B) software companies.3 This targeted approach allows the fund managers to develop deep expertise in a specific sector, potentially leading to better investment decisions within that niche. The VCT aims to invest in companies with strong recurring revenues and scalable business models.4
Portfolio Composition
The differing investment strategies are reflected in the VCTs’ respective portfolios.
British Smaller Companies VCT’s top holdings showcase its sector-agnostic approach, with investments in companies like:
Unbiased EC1 Limited: A platform connecting individuals with financial advisers and mortgage brokers.
Vypr Validation Technologies Limited: A product intelligence platform.
Xapien (via Digital Insight Technologies Ltd):5 An AI-powered research platform.
SharpCloud Software Limited: A visual communication and collaboration software provider.
Octopus Apollo VCT’s portfolio is, as expected, heavily weighted towards technology and software businesses.6 Its key holdings include:
N2JB Limited (trading as Natterbox):7 A cloud-based telephony system.
Mention Me Limited: A customer referral marketing platform.
Codebay Solutions Limited (trading as Lodgify):8 A vacation rental software provider.
Sova Assessment Limited: A talent assessment software platform.
Performance
Both VCTs have delivered positive returns for their investors, though their performance trajectories differ.
British Smaller Companies VCT has demonstrated strong long-term performance.9 Over five years, it has delivered a share price total return of 82.0% and a NAV total return of 63.6%. Over a ten-year period, these figures are 138.3% and 119.0% respectively.
Octopus Apollo VCT has also shown robust performance, with a total return of 45.3% over the five years to January 31, 2025.10
It is important to note that past performance is not indicative of future results, and the inherent risks of investing in smaller, unquoted companies remain.
Dividends
Both VCTs aim to provide investors with a regular stream of tax-free dividends.
British Smaller Companies VCT typically pays two dividends per year. Recently, it has paid dividends of 2.00p per share.
Octopus Apollo VCT targets a dividend yield of 5% of its Net Asset Value (NAV) per year. The VCT also pays dividends twice a year.
Fees and Charges
The fee structures for both VCTs are a key consideration for investors.
Fee Type
British Smaller Companies VCT
Octopus Apollo VCT
Ongoing Charge
1.75%
Net ongoing charge of 2.39%
Performance Fee
Yes, 20% of returns over a hurdle
Yes, 20% of gains above a high-water mark
Initial Charge
0% (net)
Can be up to 5.5% (though often reduced through offers)
At a Glance: Key Differences
Feature
British Smaller Companies VCT
Octopus Apollo VCT
Investment Strategy
Generalist, across various sectors
Specialist, focused on B2B software
Portfolio Focus
Diversified across industries
Concentrated in technology and software
5-Year Share Price Total Return
82.0%
N/A (Total return of 45.3% over 5 years to 31/01/25)
Dividend Policy
Two dividends per year
Targets a 5% annual dividend yield
Conclusion
The choice between British Smaller Companies VCT and Octopus Apollo VCT will largely depend on an investor’s individual risk appetite and investment philosophy.
British Smaller Companies VCT may appeal to those seeking a more diversified exposure to the UK smaller companies market, with a manager who has the flexibility to invest across a wide array of sectors.
Octopus Apollo VCT is likely to be favored by investors who are bullish on the B2B software sector and are comfortable with a more concentrated portfolio. The specialist knowledge of the management team in this area could be seen as a significant advantage.
Once the darlings of Wall Street during the global pandemic, many high-growth technology and stay-at-home stocks have since experienced a significant downturn. As the world has largely returned to pre-pandemic routines, these companies have faced headwinds from slowing growth, increased competition, and a shifting economic landscape. However, some analysts believe that a number of these former high-fliers may be poised for a recovery, presenting potential opportunities for investors with a long-term perspective.
Among the sectors that saw a surge in demand during the pandemic were e-commerce, video conferencing, home fitness, and telemedicine. Companies like Shopify, Zoom Video Communications, Peloton Interactive, and Teladoc Health became household names as their services became essential for remote work, online shopping, and virtual healthcare. Their stock prices soared to unprecedented heights as a result.
The subsequent correction in the stock prices of these “pandemic darlings” was driven by a combination of factors. As lockdowns eased, consumers began to spend less time and money on at-home activities. The rising interest rate environment also put pressure on the valuations of growth stocks, which are often more sensitive to changes in borrowing costs. Furthermore, increased competition from both established players and new entrants has intensified the challenges for these companies.
Despite the downturn, the underlying trends that propelled these companies to prominence have not entirely disappeared. The adoption of hybrid work models continues to support the need for effective video conferencing solutions. E-commerce as a share of total retail sales remains above pre-pandemic levels. The convenience and accessibility of telemedicine are likely to ensure its continued role in healthcare delivery.
For investors considering these stocks, a careful evaluation of each company’s fundamentals is crucial. Key factors to consider include their ability to innovate and differentiate their products and services, their path to profitability, and their valuation relative to their growth prospects.
Companies to Watch:
Shopify (SHOP): While the e-commerce giant has faced a slowdown from its pandemic peak, it continues to be a dominant platform for businesses of all sizes. The company’s ongoing investment in its fulfillment network and international expansion could drive future growth.
Zoom Video Communications (ZM): Despite increased competition, Zoom remains a leading player in the video conferencing market. Its expansion into enterprise communications with offerings like Zoom Phone and its focus on a hybrid work environment could provide avenues for recovery.
Peloton Interactive (PTON): The connected fitness company has endured significant challenges, including slowing demand and inventory issues. However, its strong brand recognition and loyal subscriber base could provide a foundation for a turnaround if it can successfully execute its new strategies, which include a focus on software and a more varied product lineup.
Teladoc Health (TDOC): As a leader in the telemedicine space, Teladoc is well-positioned to benefit from the long-term shift towards virtual healthcare. The company’s ability to integrate its services and demonstrate improved patient outcomes will be critical for its future success.
It is important for investors to conduct their own due diligence and consider their risk tolerance before investing in any stock. The path to recovery for these pandemic-era darlings is not guaranteed and will likely depend on their ability to adapt to the evolving market landscape and execute their growth strategies effectively.